Since the publishing of this article, it has come to light that the act of crafting a fire is not something the player can do. "Our review of Ancestors provided a small aside statement that the act of building fires was a mundane activity. They've since crossed out the "building fires" part, and their apology at the bottom clarifies the mistake. In their review, they said: "Sharpening sticks, building fires.most abilities are rather mundane at first". "Our review of Ancestors: The Humankind Odyssey has been updated after the discovery of a factual inconsistency", they say, before expressing their apologies. But MSPoweruser have since apologised to Desilets and Panache Digital Games on Twitter.
In VG247's article, Desilets didn't mention which particular news outlets may have mentioned features which didn't exist in the game, or who otherwise seemed not to have played it. And I’m used to having a bigger number than that.But people expected my studio of 35 to ship a game that’s really close to Assassin’s Creed. “We received more than a 175 reviews but we received a 65 Metacritic. In talking about the game, it's often referred to as a game by a former developer of Assassin's Creed games, and Desilets seems to think this also hurt the game's reviews.
My people are pissed.” It's understandable after the time and effort that went into such an ambitious concept: essentially, you were in charge of the evolution of your clan. Just like there is no fire and you cannot ride any horses in our game, but some reviewers said ‘it wasn’t that great when you ride horses’. “I know for a fact that some just invented some elements in the game. Reviews for Ancestors: The Humankind Odyssey were mixed, but Desilets said that he could tell some of them hadn't played it. VG247 say that Desilets said as much whilst speaking at Reboot Develop Red.
0 kommentar(er)
